Post by Carl on Oct 26, 2009 13:58:42 GMT -5
After finding my article not correctly resourced at Yahoo Answers, as well as this guys cut and paste of certain aspects of this article to draw the wrong conclusion I have added a brief summary and changed the flow of the article.
This still cannot help if the reader is misled by a person not siting his sources.
I do plan another Fish as Pets hall of shame post about Yahoo Answers using this question/answer
Here is an excerpt:
This article is quite in depth, especially when one reads all the outside references/sources.
However if one conclusion/summation can be honestly be made by reading this article and the resources in their entirety, that is that although one CAN maintain a healthy aquarium or pond without a UV Sterilizer, adding this device greatly increases your chances of success and when one considers the price of many UV Sterilizers vs. the cost of replacing valuable fish, not to mention time, possible remedies, and heart ache it is often foolish to dismiss a UV Sterilizer as an irrelevant piece of equipment
UV Sterilization; summary
Carl
This still cannot help if the reader is misled by a person not siting his sources.
I do plan another Fish as Pets hall of shame post about Yahoo Answers using this question/answer
Here is an excerpt:
This article is quite in depth, especially when one reads all the outside references/sources.
However if one conclusion/summation can be honestly be made by reading this article and the resources in their entirety, that is that although one CAN maintain a healthy aquarium or pond without a UV Sterilizer, adding this device greatly increases your chances of success and when one considers the price of many UV Sterilizers vs. the cost of replacing valuable fish, not to mention time, possible remedies, and heart ache it is often foolish to dismiss a UV Sterilizer as an irrelevant piece of equipment
UV Sterilization; summary
Carl
